UAP Trail Workspace
458 cases · 37 threads
Show
2014 · Bismarck Sea / Pacific Ocean, north of Manus Island, Papua New Guinea

IM1 (CNEOS 2014-01-08): the "interstellar meteor" and the Pacific spherules

On the record
Strength A · 9/10 · 2 independent
Evidence 4/4 · Witnesses 3/3 · Backing 2/3

Official sensor data and a Space Command memo support an interstellar origin, and material was recovered, though every link is disputed in print.

Plausibility High
Score 12 · 7 factors for, 0 against

Official sensor data and a Space Command memo support an interstellar origin, and material was recovered; every link is disputed.

See the factors ↓

Natural cause proposed, not demonstrated
A spherule from the 2023 expedition · EYOS Expeditions / Interstellar Expedition (2023)
Whenfireball 8 January 2014, 17:05 UTC; sea-floor expedition 14-28 June 2023
WhereBismarck Sea / Pacific Ocean, north of Manus Island, Papua New Guinea
Backing2 independent
Evidenceofficial records, physical traces

On 8 January 2014, US government sensors recorded a fireball off Papua New Guinea. NASA's CNEOS fireball catalogue lists it with a speed of 44.8 km/s. In 2019 Amir Siraj and Avi Loeb argued from that catalogue entry that the object was on an unbound, interstellar orbit, which would make it the first known interstellar meteor ("IM1"). In April 2022 US Space Command released a memo stating that "the velocity estimate reported to NASA is sufficiently accurate to indicate an interstellar trajectory". The paper then appeared in ApJ (2022), relying on that letter. In June 2023 Loeb's Galileo Project towed a magnetic sled over the sea floor near the computed path. It recovered about 850 small spherules. The team says a subset ("BeLaU", rich in beryllium, lanthanum and uranium) has a composition unlike any known Solar System material, and links them to IM1. Every link in that chain has been challenged in print: - the speed may be overestimated (Brown & Borovička, ApJ 2023); - the seismic signal used to place the fireball was probably a truck (Fernando et al., GJI 2024); - the spherules match coal ash (Gallardo, RNAAS 2023); - the spherules are terrestrial microtektites (Desch 2024, preprint). The Loeb group has replied in RNAAS and Chemical Geology. A third Chemical Geology paper, by an independent team, re-evaluates the spherules' origin.

Evidence, in date order (2)

  1. Apr 2022U.S. Space Command (Lt. Gen. John Shaw)official
    memo that the velocity estimate indicates an interstellar trajectory Harvard Gazette, "Memo from U.S. Space Command confirms Harvard scientists' findings" (May 2022)
  2. Jun 2023Galileo Project expeditionphysical
    about 850 spherules recovered from the sea floor near the path Loeb et al. 2024, Recovery and Classification of Spherules (RNAAS 8, 39)

How plausible · High

Official sensor data and a Space Command memo support an interstellar origin, and material was recovered; every link is disputed.

  • ●●
    Access Direct observation or instruments.
  • ●●
    Character record Trained professionals.
  • ●●
    Checkable details check out Released official records.
  • ●●
    Fits the documented skeleton Fits the documented record.
  • ●●
    Physical traces or official reaction Instrument data or physical traces.
  • ●○
    Cost of speaking Named on record.

Plausibility weighs how well an account fits where secrecy hides the documents by design, so missing records never count against it. Strength measures what is documented. Assessed 2026-10-23.

On the record

  • The CNEOS entry gives, as queried today: 2014-01-08 17:05:33 UTC, 1.2°S 147.1°E, altitude 18.7 km, speed 44.8 km/s, impact energy 0.13 kt — firsthand (official catalogue) — NASA/JPL CNEOS. Note: Siraj & Loeb give 17:05:34 UTC. Loeb 2024 (arXiv:2403.07696) gives the CNEOS box centre as 1.3°S 147.6°E. The catalogue may have been revised; not checked.
  • From the CNEOS data, the authors infer a ~0.45 m meteor on an unbound orbit, with v∞ ≈ 42.1 ± 5.5 km/s outside the Solar System — analysis — Siraj & Loeb 2022 (*ApJ*). The 2019 preprint gave "99.999% confidence".
  • The DoD letter states "the velocity estimate reported to NASA is sufficiently accurate to indicate an interstellar trajectory" — secondhand (quoted) — Siraj & Loeb 2022, quoting the US Space Command letter. The *Harvard Gazette* says Lt. Gen. John Shaw signed the memo, and that Joel Mozer, chief scientist of Space Operations Command, reviewed the analysis.
  • IM1 ranks first out of 273 CNEOS fireballs in implied material strength, an outlier at 3.5σ — analysis — Siraj & Loeb 2022, *ApJL* 941, L28.
  • A seismometer signal localises the fireball to ~16 km² within the ~120 km² box allowed by the DoD coordinates — analysis — Siraj & Loeb 2023 (*Signals*).
  • Expedition finds — firsthand (expedition team) — Loeb et al. 2024 (*RNAAS*; *Chemical Geology* 670): a towed-magnetic-sled survey, 14-28 June 2023, about 85 km north of Manus Island; about 850 spherules, 0.05-1.3 mm.

Claims

The BeLaU spherules came from IM1 and support its interstellar origin "independently of the high velocity and unusual material strength (analysis/speculation)analysisSourced, unconfirmedLoeb et al. 2023 (preprint).
BeLaU material could come from the magma ocean of an extrasolar planet "or from more exotic sourcesspeculationSourced, unconfirmedLoeb et al. 2023.
IM1 could have been artificial; the Galileo Project planned the expedition partly to "study whether it was natural or artificial in originspeculationSourced, unconfirmedLoeb & Laukien 2023 (*J. Astron. Instrum.*). Artificial origin proposed, not demonstrated.
The expedition's search area was set by the CNEOS satellite box, not by the infrasound data, so the Fernando et al. infrasound result does not undercut itPeak-Brightness Localization of the CNEOS 2014-01-08 (IM1) FireballanalysisSourced, unconfirmedLoeb 2024 (arXiv:2403.07696, preprint).
The Fe isotopes show a Solar System origin with ">99.995% probability"; there is no spatial correlation of spherules with the path; the Be is consistent with ferromanganese nodulesanalysisSourced, unconfirmedDesch & Jackson 2023 (arXiv:2311.07699, preprint, not peer reviewed).
The BeLaU spherules are microtektites of terrestrial lateritic sandstone from the Australasian tektite strewn field (about 788 kyr old)analysisSourced, unconfirmedDesch 2024 (arXiv:2403.05161, preprint, not peer reviewed).

Where

Bismarck Sea / Pacific Ocean, north of Manus Island, Papua New Guinea
1.0°S 147.0°E
‹ Previous in Ocean & USOsChilean Navy helicopter FLIR: the object with the hot plume12 of 44Next in Ocean & USOs ›Gimbal & GoFast

Similar cases · sharing people, threads, topics or era

'Oumuamua (1I/2017 U1): the first known interstellar object 2017Beatriz Villarroel, VASCO and the pre-Sputnik Palomar transients 2019The Galileo Project (Harvard, Avi Loeb) 2021Lockheed's 12 craft 2009

People and organizations

Avi Loeb person

Threads · click one to see it on the board

Sources

A research project by Igor FrancePrivacy